What is Fachsprachtrainer?

Fachsprachtrainer is an AI-powered training platform for medical German. It helps doctors train their medical language for clinical practice and the Fachsprachprüfung (FSP) — through conversation simulations, Arztbrief exercises, and aloud practice with speech recognition.

What's the difference from Kenntnistrainer?

Kenntnistrainer prepares for the Kenntnisprüfung — that's about medical knowledge. Fachsprachtrainer focuses on medical language and communication in German. Two different exams, two specialized platforms.

Does the FSP only test language or also medical knowledge?

The FSP primarily tests your ability to communicate medically in German — conversations, documentation, explanations. Basic medical knowledge is assumed, but the exam evaluates your language competence.

What German level do I need to start?

B2 German is recommended. You choose your own starting level, and the exercises adapt to the level you picked — from basic communication to exam-ready C1 medical language.

How does speaking practice work?

You speak medical terms and sentences. The app compares the recognized text with the expected phrase and honestly shows which words were recognized. This is training feedback, not an official pronunciation assessment.

Can I practice writing medical reports?

Yes. You receive a clinical scenario and write an Arztbrief. The AI gives you feedback on the structure, medical language, grammar, and completeness of your letter — and shows improvements sentence by sentence.

How is this different from a regular German course?

German courses teach everyday language. Fachsprachtrainer trains medical communication — history taking, findings discussion, patient counseling, medical reports. Every exercise is medical and exam-relevant.

Is there a free plan?

Yes. During the current testing phase you can try every learning area for free. Please tell us directly if something is missing or broken.

Is Fachsprachtrainer also useful for doctors already working in Germany?

Absolutely. Many users are already working in clinical settings and want to improve their medical communication — ward round language, medical reports, patient counseling. The training is as practice-relevant as it is exam-relevant.

Which medical specialties are covered?

Scenarios cover internal medicine, surgery, emergency medicine, pediatrics, gynecology, neurology, and more. New scenarios are added regularly.

Does the AI make decisions about me?

No. The AI only gives you practice feedback on your training conversations and practice documents — it makes no automated decisions about you as a person (GDPR Art. 22). Your practice results have no effect on the real Fachsprachprüfung: it is conducted and graded exclusively by human examiners of the medical chambers (Ärztekammern). And how you use the feedback for your learning is entirely up to you.

All FSP articles

Experience reports/Mistake review

Using FSP experience reports correctly: hints, not rules

Why protocols and experience reports help, but never replace official sources or your own practice.

5 minUpdated: 19 June 2026ErfahrungsberichteProtokolleQuellen

Experience report

Official factPersonal experiencePossible practice question

How an experience report gets sorted: official fact, personal experience, possible practice question

Short answer

Experience reports show which questions are possible. They do not prove what will appear in your region or exam date.

Context

An experience report reads like a glimpse behind the exam door — and for that very reason tempts you to mistake one person's case for the rule.

Experience reports show which questions are possible. They do not prove what will appear in your region or exam date.

Why reports are still useful

Federal Medical Practitioners' Act, section 3

Binding information comes from the authority and medical chamber, not from forums. Still, experience reports show something valuable: what kind of questions and situations can occur in practice.

At a glance

Binding information comes from the authority and medical chamber.
Regional details can vary between chambers.
FSP tests language action in a medical context.

What reports cannot prove

Bavarian Medical Chamber: Fachsprachprüfung

A report shows one single experience on a particular day at a particular chamber. Regional details can vary between chambers, and FSP tests language action in a medical context – not a fixed question script identical everywhere.

How to evaluate a report sensibly

Mark three categories in every report: official fact, personal experience, possible practice question. Build your own simulations from recurring themes instead of memorising copied sentences – a memorised sentence does not help if the exam plays out differently. If several reports independently mention a particular topic such as chest pain or dizziness, for example, that is a good hint to specifically practise that topic in your own simulation – not because it is guaranteed to appear, but because it is evidently a common practice area.

Visually separate official fact, personal experience, and practice idea from each other.
Practise the underlying skill, not the literal sentence.

Common misunderstandings

One misunderstanding: a forum protocol is as reliable as chamber guidance. A second: if enough reports claim the same thing, it automatically becomes an official rule – frequency in forums does not replace an official source.

Next step

Take the next experience report you read and immediately sort it into the three categories before you fold it into your preparation.

Practise FSP realistically now

Practise history-taking, documentation, doctor-doctor conversation, and terminology in an exam-like flow.

Start training