All FSP articles
Part 3/Exam part

Doctor-doctor conversation in FSP: case presentation and follow-up questions

Part 3 requires colleague-level language: precise, concise, and medically understandable.

4 minUpdated: 26 May 2026Arzt-Arzt-GesprächFallvorstellungTeil 3
1Doctor–patient conversation
2Documentation
3Doctor–doctor conversation
Part 3 highlighted in the sequence: doctor-doctor conversation as the closing part after patient conversation and documentation

Short answer

In the doctor-doctor conversation, you switch from patient-friendly language to professional handoff.

At a glance

  • BLÄK names the doctor-doctor conversation as the third exam part.
  • In Bavaria this part is usually set at 20 minutes.
  • Professional language in workplace communication is assessed.

Context

The same case, the same person — but the sentence that just reassured the patient suddenly sounds long-winded in front of the senior doctor. Part 3 tests exactly that leap.

In the doctor-doctor conversation, you switch from patient-friendly language to professional handoff.

The third part: from patient to colleague

Bavarian Medical Chamber: Fachsprachprüfung

BLÄK names the doctor-doctor conversation as the third FSP part, usually around 20 minutes in Bavaria too. What is tested is professional medical communication between colleagues – the same case as in part 1, but in a completely different register.

The register switch is the core: same information, different audience, different language.

What makes a good handoff

The core is the register switch: same information, different audience, different language. A senior doctor has no time for patient-friendly detours – they need prioritisation, correct terminology, and a clear order.

  • Standard order: patient, chief complaint, relevant history, suspicion, differential diagnoses, procedure.
  • Prepare for follow-up questions on terms and reasoning, not only for the presentation itself.

An example of the right length

A case presentation of about 90 seconds is a good practice frame: '62-year-old patient, intermittent palpitations for three weeks, unremarkable history, suspected paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, ECG and echocardiography ordered.' Anything beyond that belongs in the follow-up questions, not the opening.

Common misunderstandings

One misunderstanding: the more technical terms, the better. Unused or misplaced technical terms sound insecure rather than competent. A second: the handoff is a repeat of the patient conversation – it is a compressed, newly prioritised version of it.

Next step

Take your last practised case and summarise it in 90 seconds for a senior doctor, spoken aloud and timed – this immediately shows where you are still too detailed.

Practise FSP realistically now

Practise history-taking, documentation, doctor-doctor conversation, and terminology in an exam-like flow.

Start training